Newsletter
August 2025

Newsletter 08-2025

Welcome to the August 2025 Bearning Newsletter. This summer’s standout banking topic is the accelerating move from “crypto on the fringes” to stablecoins with a statutory framework - and what that means for bank Treasury and ALM. On 18 July, the United States enacted the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins), the first federal law that defines “payment stablecoins” and sets approval, reserve, custody and supervision requirements for issuers. For banks, this is not just a U.S. headline: it signals how tokenised money could interact with deposits, liquidity, and safe-asset markets.

1. Insights for Banking Professionals

Stablecoins in banking: what changed this summer, what it means for Treasury & ALM

Why the topic just moved to the top of the agenda. In July, the U.S. enacted the GENIUS Act (Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins) creating a federal regime for “payment stablecoins.” In plain terms, these are fiat-pegged tokens redeemable 1:1 (typically to USD) that meet new rules on reserves, redemption and supervision. Among other things, issuers must hold identifiable 1:1 reserves in cash and short-dated government instruments, and are for now prohibited from paying interest or yield to holders solely for holding the coin. Supervisory responsibilities are split between federal and state regulators, with clear solvency and redemption protections for customers.

Which coins are we actually talking about? The Act’s scope is payment stablecoins (fiat-pegged), not the broader universe of “algorithmic” or crypto-collateralized designs. In market practice, the largest payment stablecoins are Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC; they dominate flows and disclosures discussed in recent BIS work and are treated as key issuers in that analysis.

Source: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/usd-coin/
Market Cap USDC compared to Bitcoin, Source: Coinmarketcap.com

What the BIS found (and why taxonomy matters). The BIS’s November 2023 paper "Will the real stablecoin please stand up?" mapped the market across four types (fiat-backed, crypto-backed, commodity-backed, and unbacked/“algorithmic”), documented how major events (eg., Terra/Luna 2022, FTX 2022) reshaped volumes and concentration, and highlighted transparency gaps in reserve reporting and stabilization mechanisms. Most importantly, across 68 stablecoins studied, none maintained perfect 1:1 parity at all times, regardless of size or backing. Today’s renewed policy interest (and the GENIUS Act) explicitly centers on the fiat-pegged segment.

Article content
Source: BIS paper "Will the real stablecoin please stand up?" (Nov 2023)

Why banks (ALM & Treasury) should care?

  • The BIS’s May 2025 paper "Stablecoins and safe asset prices" shows stablecoin flows now move the very short end of the U.S. curve: a two-sigma (standard deviation) inflow (about $3.5bn in their sample) lowers 3-month T-bill yields by ~2–2.5 bps within ~10 days, with limited spillover along the curve. Outflows bite harder: the same-size outflow raises 3-month yields by ~6–8 bps. (explanation: “two-sigma” just means a relatively large move vs typical 5-day net flows.) The issuer breakdown attributes the largest share of the effect to USDT, followed by USDC, consistent with market size and disclosed bill holdings. For Treasury & ALM, this means stablecoin reserve management is a non-trivial new demand (and potential selling) pressure in T-bills that can color pricing, hedging, and liquidity assumptions. This dynamic touches pricing, FTP base curves, and liquidity buffers that reference front-end rates.
Article content
Source: BIS paper "Stablecoins and safe asset prices" (May 2025)
  • However, this fact also has another very significant consequence for bank ALM and Treasury: Although the GENIUS act currently prohibits issuers from paying out returns, there is ongoing discussion in the market about "rewards" (e.g., wallet/platform incentives) at the platform level and the possible leakage of deposits. Bank Treasury/ALM teams should test the stability of non-maturity deposits (NMDs), the potential elasticity of deposit migration, and behavioral beta in various scenarios with alternative reward structures. This requires scenario analysis, meaning that even smaller and simpler banks will need advanced ALM tools to successfully manage their assets and liabilities.

The transatlantic angle - what does Europe do now?

The EU already brought stablecoin issuance under MiCA (for EMTs and ARTs) as of 30 June 2024, with the EBA now finalizing technical standards on reserves, liquidity and disclosure. But on digital money initiatives, the U.S. legislative leap raises competitive questions. The ECB’s digital euro remains in a preparation phase (rulebook work, pilots, stakeholder engagement); policymakers aim for a political framework by early 2026. The UK’s digital pound project is in its design phase with ongoing policy/tech work. MiCA is in force, but EUR-denominated stablecoins remain tiny: together they’re around $0.5B (≈0.2% of the global stablecoin market, figures as of 1 Sep 2025). EURC is the largest euro coin, sitting around #11 by market cap at roughly $0.24B—orders of magnitude below USD-backed leaders USDT (~$168B) and USDC (~$71.5B). The policy question is whether Europe accelerates CBDC timelines (digital euro/UK digital pound) or further refines MiCA to catalyze safe, scalable euro rails.

Recommended reading

How Bearning can help

Our professionals have supported Treasury/ALM teams with solution-finding for 30+ years. We provide consultations on key balance-sheet and market-risk topics—policy impact mapping, liquidity and FTP scenarios, ALM operating models, governance, and board/ALCO briefings—tailored to your balance sheet and risk appetite. As part of our consulting (https://study.bearning.com/pages/consulting), we also help banks evaluate, select, and implement the most suitable ALM and planning solution with trusted partners, for example QuantPlan, a quantitative planning and ALM software solution for banks.

2. Bearning Courses and E-Learning Updates

Free webinar: FTP & Quantitative Planning

  • 🗓 October 9, 2025 | 🕒 15:00–16:00 CEST (Bratislava)
  • Topic: Funds Transfer Pricing (FTP) and quantitative planning with Bearning & QuantPlan

In Section 1 we highlighted how stablecoin flows can move front-end rates and why that matters for Treasury/ALM. This reinforces the need to shape the FTP base curve thoughtfully (e.g., front-end reference, liquidity premiums, behavioral add-ons) and to run scenario analysis that stress-tests deposit elasticity, funding mix, and rate paths. In this 60-minute, practice-oriented session, our speakers Martin Macko (Bearning) and Michal Lopušan, CFA (QuantPlan) will:

  • Frame FTP as a tool for pricing, performance, and risk management.
  • Walk through a model bank setup in QuantPlan, showing how to translate policy into analytics and dashboards.
  • Demonstrate scenario-based planning across rate and balance-sheet shocks, including implications for the FTP curve and product pricing.
  • Close with Q&A grounded in real-world use cases.

Check detailed content and register here: Bearning FTP & Quantitative Planning Webinar (MS Teams)

Article content

Build the core skill set for ALM teams

To contribute effectively in Treasury/ALM, professionals need a solid grasp of: bank management strategy, controlling & internal pricing (FTP), ALM procedures, Treasury & financial market products, risk management, budgeting & planning, and bank regulation. All of these are covered in our structured e-learning bundles: 👉 https://study.bearning.com/bundles/banking-and-financial-management

Access & extras:

  • Lifetime access to all enrolled courses
  • Certificates for each completed course
  • 1,000+ expert-level questions with explanations
  • SimBa (Excel-based bank simulation) available for download

Offer: Although our summer discount has ended, we’ve decided to contribute to bank education by extending a special offer for our community. Bearning newsletter readers and followers get 40% off - use code 2025EXTRA40 at checkout. The discount applies to our banking & financial management bundles and includes lifetime access and course certificates.

3. Kurzy v slovenskom jazyku

Registrácie na jesenné termíny Bearning kurzov sú otvorené. Zameriavame sa na témy, ktoré hýbu bankovníctvom: ALM & Treasury, kapitálové trhy a spracovanie CP, regulácia a riziká, AML/KYC, aj umelá inteligencia vo finančných službách.

  • 📅 25. 09. – Treasury Workshop
  • 📅 02. 10. – Kapitálový trh a spracovanie cenných papierov
  • 📅 06. 10. – Umelá inteligencia (AI) v bankovníctve
  • 📅 21. 10. – KYC a AML v banke
  • 📅 22. 10. – Digitálne peniaze
  • 📅 23. 10. – Kapitálový trh
  • 📅 11. 11. – Banková regulácia
  • 📅 12. 11. – Riadenie likvidity banky
  • 📅 26. 11. – Krypto-trhy a MiCA regulácia
  • 📅 02. 12. – Riziká a zlyhania bánk

Treasury Workshop — 25. 9. 2025

Praktický, interaktívny pohľad na fungovanie treasury v banke a obchodovanie na peňažnom, kapitálovom a devízovom trhu. Účastníci si ujasnia základné princípy riadenia trhových rizík, produktové spektrum a bežné treasury stratégie. Vhodné pre Treasury, ALM, riadenie rizík a controlling. Viac informácií a registrácia: Treasury Workshop.

Kapitálový trh a spracovanie cenných papierov — 2. 10. 2025

Koncentrovaný prehľad typov cenných papierov, ich emisie a obchodovania, s dôrazom na zúčtovanie, vyporiadanie, evidenciu a custody. Praktické postupy a „end-to-end“ procesy pre back-office/operations, risk & compliance a podporu IT. Viac informácií a registrácia: Kapitálový trh a spracovanie cenných papierov.

Umelá inteligencia (AI) v bankovníctve — 6. 10. 2025

Ako AI rozumne zaviesť do bankových procesov: use-cases v risku a financovaní, podpora AML/KYC (s dôrazom na kontrolu rizík), tvorba politiky a governance pre AI nástroje a praktické ukážky práce s modelmi (bez potreby programovania). Kurz je určený najmä pre bankových manažérov a špecialistov, ktorí AI potrebujú bezpečne a účelne používať v praxi. Viac informácií a registrácia: Umelá inteligencia (AI) v bankovníctve

🎓 Bonus pre účastníkov: vybrané kurzy dopĺňame e-learningom v angličtine s certifikátom. ➡️ Kompletný kalendár, podrobnosti a registrácia na Bearning kurzy: https://bearning.sk/sk/public-workshops-calendar

4. Banking Industry Quiz

Test Your Knowledge with Bearning’s Monthly Quiz ✅❌❔

Stablecoins are no longer a fringe topic: their reserve allocation now influences front-end rates, liquidity pricing, and the shape of banks’ FTP curves. Knowing what sits behind the largest coins matters for ALM scenario design.

Question: As of 30 June 2025, approximately what share of USDT (Tether) reserves were backed by U.S. Treasuries (counting direct T-bill holdings plus indirect exposure via repos and money-market funds)?

  • A) 58%
  • B) 67%
  • C) 78%
  • D) 92%

👉 Check the next Bearning newsletter for the correct answer and a brief explanation.

5. Quiz Solution Corner ✅

Review and Learn from Last Month's Quiz

❓ In which area are US banking regulations typically stricter compared to Europe?

  • A) Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR)
  • B) Market Risk Capital Requirements
  • C) Leverage Ratio
  • D) Interest Rate Risk in the Banking Book (IRRBB)

✅ Correct answer: C) Leverage Ratio

Why: In the U.S., the largest banks are subject to the Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) plus an enhanced SLR (eSLR). The 2014 final rule effectively set a 5% threshold at the holding-company level (3% minimum SLR + 2% buffer) and 6% at insured depository subsidiaries to avoid distribution limits - materially above Basel’s 3% floor.

By contrast, the EU made the leverage ratio binding at 3% from June 2021, and from 2023 added a G-SII (Global Systemically Important Institution) leverage ratio buffer equal to 50% of a bank’s risk-based G-SII buffer (so, for many EU G-SIIs, totals around 3.5%–4.75%). That calibration is generally below the long-standing U.S. eSLR levels.

Note: In July 2025 U.S. agencies proposed modifying the eSLR (moving to a buffer linked to the G-SIB surcharge), which, if finalized, would lower today’s eSLR thresholds. But as of now it’s a proposal, not a final rule, and historically the U.S. leverage regime has been stricter than the EU’s.

Why the other options weren’t the best choice:

  • A) LCR: Both jurisdictions implement Basel’s LCR; the EU applies it broadly (solo + consolidated) to all banks. The U.S. rule is similar in design but scope and calibration differ; it isn’t generally “stricter” than the EU across the board.
  • B) Market Risk Capital: The EU has progressed earlier on elements of FRTB reporting, while U.S. reforms are tied up in the Basel “endgame” process; “U.S. stricter” isn’t a consistent characterization. (No single authoritative source says U.S. is tighter overall.)
  • D) IRRBB: The EU has detailed EBA Guidelines/RTS, including standardized approaches and supervisory outlier tests for EVE and NII; In the U.S., agencies rely on interagency guidance (not an EU-style standardised framework) for IRR management. More prescriptive quantitative requirements and reporting tend to scale up primarily for larger banks (Categories I–IV, typically $100bn+ in assets), not for every bank, hence the EU approach is typically seen as stricter in IRRBB.

📚 Want to practice more? Visit our Bearning e-learning platform for 1000+ quiz questions and full course bundles on treasury, ALM, and derivatives. Use now bundles with 40% off!

Stay Connected with Bearning

We hope this month’s insights, updates, and quiz have helped you stay informed and inspired in your professional banking journey. At Bearning, we continue to support bankers and financial professionals through practical education, in-house trainings, and consulting - because Bearning is Bank Learning!

Let us know if you’d like to organize a workshop, explore e-learning for your team, or book a consultation.

Martin Macko
Bearning CEO, lektor

ALM & Treasury, Riadenie rizík, Finančné riadenie banky, Banková regulácia, Fintech